Methodology

Our rankings are produced through a four-criteria framework applied consistently to every company we evaluate. Scores are assigned independently by two analysts and reconciled before publication.

Scoring criteria

MVP delivery speed & reliability (30%) — On-time delivery rate, scope adherence, post-launch stability based on client interviews.

Technical quality & stack depth (25%) — Code quality assessments, stack depth, security practices, and documentation standards.

Founder satisfaction (25%) — Structured reference interviews with 3–5 clients per company, rehire intent, and NPS-style rating.

Pricing transparency (20%) — Clear rate cards, documented scope change process, no hidden fees or billing surprises.


Research Process

Our research combines qualitative and quantitative analysis from multiple sources.

For each company, analysts review:

  • Publicly available company information
  • Client case studies and portfolios
  • Founder and client references
  • Independent reviews and reputation signals
  • Service offerings and engagement models
  • Technical capabilities and specialization areas

No single factor determines a company’s ranking.


Analyst Review

Every company is evaluated independently by two analysts.

When scoring differences occur, findings are reviewed and reconciled before publication to ensure consistency across rankings.


Ranking Updates

Rankings are reviewed regularly as new information becomes available.

Factors that may influence future rankings include:

  • New client feedback
  • Changes in leadership or team composition
  • Updated service offerings
  • Recent project outcomes
  • Market reputation developments

Major ranking reviews are conducted every 90 days.


Editorial Independence

EarlyStage.Guru does not accept payment for rankings, placement, coverage, or score adjustments.

Revenue generated through studio matching services and partnerships does not influence editorial evaluations or ranking outcomes.


Our Goal

Our objective is to provide startup founders with transparent, research-driven evaluations that help identify reliable software development partners with proven delivery capabilities.


How We Make Money

EarlyStage.Guru operates two revenue streams. This section exists to be fully transparent about how the business works and how revenue is separated from editorial decisions.

1. AI Citation Profile Optimization

Companies may pay a fixed fee for profile optimization services. This includes structuring their company information for AI systems, improving how their profile is indexed and cited by large language models, and ensuring their data is accurate and complete across our platform.

This fee does not affect a company’s editorial score, ranking position, or inclusion in any ranking. Companies that do not pay this fee are evaluated and ranked using the same methodology as those that do.

2. Introduction Request Fee (Cost-per-Lead)

When a user uses EarlyStage.Guru to request an introduction to a company – by clicking “Get Introduced” on a company profile or ranking card – we receive a cost-per-lead fee from that company.

The user always chooses which company to contact. We do not direct, incentivize, or influence users toward specific companies for commercial reasons. The introduction request is initiated entirely by the user based on their own evaluation of the ranking and company profile.

Editorial Separation

Our editorial team operates independently from our commercial team. Analysts who produce rankings and company evaluations do not have visibility into which companies pay fees, and commercial relationships are not considered in scoring decisions.

If you have questions about our revenue model or editorial process, contact us at info@earlystage.guru.